<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blue Bamboo Consulting Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NLP Breakfast Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/06/58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/06/58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Blog – Breakfast meeting on NLP</p> <p>So…….we got calls from Recruitment Company MDs asking for more information on NLP (neuro-linguistic programming). In response we ran an introductory ‘breakfast meeting’ on NLP – what it is, how it will be useful and some of the basic ideas &#8211; and it went down a storm – <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/06/58/">NLP Breakfast Seminar</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog – Breakfast meeting on NLP</p>
<p>So…….we got calls from Recruitment Company MDs asking for more information on NLP (neuro-linguistic programming). In response we ran an introductory ‘breakfast meeting’ on NLP – what it is, how it will be useful and some of the basic ideas &#8211; and it went down a storm – what a great way to start the day!</p>
<p>People generally know something about NLP – the theory – or at least they have heard of it.  Interestingly though &#8211; the feedback suggested that what people most enjoyed was the interactive sessions – actually learning how the whole thing works ‘in the muscle’.  It’s the drawing together of theory and practice that ‘does it’ for people on NLP.  It’s fun……it’s interesting and most people now want to know more!</p>
<p>And our MD’s kind of ‘got it’ – how useful it will be for them.</p>
<p>So if you want to improve your rapport skills with clients – try NLP which leads to more business and £££.  If you want to motivate non-performers in your team – from the inside out, NLP can help people set clear goals and be motivated to really want to achieve them. Really want to be ‘tip-top’ in the area of leading and communicating? Yes it can help in this area too…….and so much more.</p>
<p>So give it a go – by popular demand our next NLP breakfast meeting is being held on 7th July 2011 in London – contact us to find out more on 0800 9888 208.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/06/58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Deal With Procurement People</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/05/how-to-deal-with-procurement-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/05/how-to-deal-with-procurement-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recruiters are increasinly coming up against procurement people. to learm how to deal with them go to <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/05/how-to-deal-with-procurement-people/">How To Deal With Procurement People</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that large blue chips are running their PSLs through their procurement people these days.  Although recruiters would not admit it, most are struggling to understand and influence procurement people and the PSL process.</p>
<p>Recruiters used to deal with line managers or HR people who, although not always friendly, were familiar.  Now it’s those ‘aggressive’ procurement types who are just looking to cut margins and make the savings………..</p>
<p>So, how should recruiters approach this issue to enable them to win the business and maximise margins? A few ideas to consider:</p>
<p>Learning about how procurement teams are organised can often be very revealing and assist greatly in business development by targeting the right individuals.  Mapping out teams is not always easy – but knowing about common procurement models can help.</p>
<p>Procurement people are trained in managing the ‘category management’ process – and this involves far more than just sending out a tender.  Learning more about this process, the key stakeholders involved and the timings on the reviews can be worth its weight in gold.</p>
<p>Stepping into the shoes of procurement can also be revealing – how do they work, what targets do they work to, what KPIs are they measured by?  Remember, their bonuses are often based on achieving these targets.</p>
<p>What is the profile of a ‘typical’ procurement person and what makes them tick?  What things can a recruitment company do to get on their radar and influence them to consider quality, speed of fulfilment, geographical coverage and the other important USP’s of your recruitment business?</p>
<p>Of course, some recruiters try another option &#8211; to avoid procurement and the PSL entirely and target off-PSL areas………!.</p>
<p>Blue Bamboo is a specialist provider of training and coaching to the recruitment sector and other corporates. For more details on our course ‘How to deal with Procurement People’ contact us on  0800 9888 208 or <a href="mailto:info@bluebambooconsulting.com">info@bluebambooconsulting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/05/how-to-deal-with-procurement-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those you have around you&#8230;&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/03/those-you-have-around-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/03/those-you-have-around-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those you have around you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. This is unashamedly aimed at MDs of Recruitment Companies. You are a unique breed, a blend of determination, arrogance, genius and as the French say ‘Je ne sais quoi’ (it would seem&#8230;) You have chosen to lead, to set up, to grow something. You didn’t just fall on an <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/03/those-you-have-around-you/">Those you have around you&#8230;&#8230;..</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those you have around you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
This is unashamedly aimed at MDs of Recruitment Companies.  You are a unique breed, a blend of determination, arrogance, genius and as the French say ‘Je ne sais quoi’ (it would seem&#8230;)<br />
You have chosen to lead, to set up, to grow something.   You didn’t just fall on an idea to develop a recruitment business and employ lots of people.  And so sometimes, you are your own worst enemy.<br />
Success does have its downsides.  Once the business grows, people start being more polite than honest.  Even paid advisors who are supposed to give it you straight start to play the long game&#8230;&#8230;.not wanting to impact their fees.<br />
And starting to believe your own PR machine is the ultimate in sitting dangerously on the edge.  Some even think they are invincible, untouchable.  Yet underneath, for many, there is still a nagging doubt, a feeling that you still need and want to develop yourself further.<br />
Many MDs use personal executive coaches to help &#8211; to gain some perspective, someone to help them problem solve, someone sitting outside the business.  Time for them – to develop themselves further.  Leading to a clarification around employees – you don’t have to like them all, but you have to trust them.  Setting the culture – no crawling to the MD or leadership team, valuing people telling it how it is &#8211; irrespective of how it might affect their position.<br />
 It is sometimes lonely at the top – but those at the top need honesty, good feedback and support – internal and external &#8211; to keep them on track.  A sycophantic culture will get everyone nowhere&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
A useful question that a recruitment MD might ask themselves is: “what’s the next step for me and my own personal development?”<br />
Blog by Christina Langley, Co-founder of Blue Bamboo Consulting and MD of Langley Search &#038; Selection – contact her on Christina@bluebambooconsulting.com or +44(0)800 9 888 208.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/03/those-you-have-around-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To touch, or not to touch?</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/to-touch-or-not-to-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/to-touch-or-not-to-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLP & Coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts from the Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently a friend I know was seen by his boss giving his female colleague a hug and afterwards he was warned by his manager to avoid all physical contact at work for fear of prosecution.  So is it wrong to give someone the occasional touch? </p> <p>Naturally high profile publicity on legislation and the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/to-touch-or-not-to-touch/">To touch, or not to touch?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recently a friend I know was seen by his boss giving his female colleague a hug and afterwards he was warned by his manager to avoid all physical contact at work for fear of prosecution.  So is it wrong to give someone the occasional touch?</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Naturally high profile publicity on legislation and the current ‘PC’ environment means that there is an increased risk of employers finding themselves facing legal challenges.  For those with a natural communication style that includes touching and physical contact, there may be more to think about now in terms of their physical behaviours in the workplace. </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>However perhaps the tide is turningRecent comments by Michael Gove (Secretary of State for Education) have outlined that it is ok for music teachers to touch pupils – despite the unions recommending the contrary.  The same is true of PE teachers. </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>In certain situations, touching clearly has benefits – for example, research on hospital patients has determined that physical contact is beneficial to recovery – and babies thrive on physical contact.  Certain training for customer care personnel also includes how to touch people ‘acceptably’.</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>And in other social and business situations handshakes and kisses on the cheek are acceptable and a normal part of people interacting. Sales and Recruitment people are actually coached on what sort of handshake to give (firm but not crushing). And this is why this whole topic is complicated –people react in many different ways to any sort of physical contact and, indeed, to others entering into their ‘personal space’. Others see people as ‘stand-offish’ if there is no physical contact.</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>So what is appropriate touching and where does physical contact stray into the arena of harassment?  My experience has been that it’s all about having an awareness of what others expect and would like.   One way to evaluate the level and type of contact that would be appropriate for someone,  is to ‘calibrate’ them.  This is a term widely used in NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) to define how we can observe verbal and non-verbal cues (spoken language and body language) in order to evaluate someone’s ‘typical’ behaviours and preferences for the way they interact.  NLP teaches the importance of observation – not just of the individual but of the <em>context</em> in which they are behaving.  For example, if learning to swing a golf club for the first time, it’s common for people to welcome or even invite physical contact from their coach to show them how to do it.  In a different context, the same person may be very reluctant to receive any sort of touching from others. </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>In NLP we learn that there are 3 typical preferences (modalities) that include <em>visual</em>, <em>auditory</em> and kinaesthetic preferences that we all tend to use to describe and make sense of our experiences.  For example, people with visual preferences like to see pictures, use graphs, they talk quickly and tend to use terms using the visual context e.g“I see what you mean”,  “It looks good to me”.  Those with an auditory bias may not make so much eye contact and use phrases like “It rings a bell”, ‘Sounds good to me”.  And those with a kinaesthetic preference often say things like “I feel good about that”, “It didn’t feel right to me”’.  Not surprisingly, this group is the most likely to enjoy the tactile experience, although people can respond very differently depending on the context of their behaviours </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>So, observing and calibrating carefully and  being more aware of people’s preferences can help you evaluate how much (and what types of) physical contact will be appropriate – or how much more would help you build rapport with them. And  remember, you can always ask them to ensure you have it just right………..</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>I’m guessing that the hug my friend gave his colleague was, an expression of friendliness that did not cause offence. </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Of course, there may be some clues in her boss’s response that he might have a preference for visual or auditory communication – I wonder how she’s going to find out?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/to-touch-or-not-to-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year&#8217;s Resolutions?  Bah humbug!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-resolutions-bah-humbug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-resolutions-bah-humbug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts from the Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Year's Resolutions? What about a tiny, weeney change of just one bit of a comfort zone? Easy really.... <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-resolutions-bah-humbug/">New Year&#8217;s Resolutions?  Bah humbug!</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting phenomenon (I love writing that word&#8230;) &#8211; New Year Resolutions.  It&#8217;s almost a &#8216;given&#8217; that, at the turn of a new year people seem compelled to re-examine their lives , albeit at varying degrees of seriousness, with a view to changing some out-of-date habits and installing some new ones that they feel will be worthwhile and &#8220;good for them&#8221;.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s a very human thing to respond to external triggers like the New Year.  Birthdays, anniversaries, a newly decorated room, a new car, a style make-over, a new job&#8230;.all useful spurs to action.  Why is this?</p>
<p>Perhaps because it&#8217;s also very human to become comfortable and have a life where things are more predictable and less subject to change.  After all, who wouldn&#8217;t want to return to comfort zones?  They&#8217;re nice places to be, aren&#8217;t they?  And quite right too: sometimes we spend an inordinate amount of time working hard to establish those &#8216;norms&#8217; that give us certainty and that warm feeling of having arrived &#8216;home&#8217;.  So why the periodic (and with some people, very regular) urge for a personal spring clean?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s because at a pretty deep level human beings are driven by self-improvement and personal development.  It&#8217;s true that sometimes it’s not so visible on the surface of people&#8217;s behaviours.  That gym membership, taken out on the 1st January, only being used four times, for example!  And the pain in the neck colleague, who always seems to delight in taking an entrenched position, never considering a change of mind, may be another example&#8230;..</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: I think we&#8217;re &#8216;hard-wired&#8217; to evolve.  From Maslow to L. Michael Hall we can see a pattern bedding in over centuries: once certain basic needs are met (those primarily concerned with our personal survival and safety), we start to crave <em>more</em>.  Hall&#8217;s work on self actualisation (go to <a href="http://www.self-actualizing.org/articles.html">http://www.self-actualizing.org/articles.html</a>) has done a huge amount to make this central aspect of human motivation more accessible and understandable.  From my perspective, the arrival of an urge to do something different is an indicator of a basic instinct for evolution.  It’s as if we’ve become aware that the outcomes we’re getting in our lives – work or personal – are not the ones we’d like or hoped for and that it’s time for a change.</p>
<p>Paradoxically, perhaps, it’s often within the nature of change itself that we find most satisfaction.   Simply doing something differently, guaranteeing some sort of difference in outcomes, is often enough to shift our emotions around the issue.  Even making a firm decision can sometimes be enough to ensure a qualitative change in someone’s outcomes.</p>
<p>And so here I am, having taken out that gym membership and been committed enough to go six times so far this year.  Will power, eh?  And I’ve also written a short article for our website Resource Centre on the ‘New Year, New You’ stuff (go to <a href="../../">www.bluebambooconsulting.com</a>) where those of you considering your career options at this time can digest my pearls of wisdom.</p>
<p>So to conclude, I’m wondering what sorts of resolutions you’ve made?  Maybe yours is <em>not </em>to make any resolutions at all this year, and just see how things pan out.  Maybe the New Year just isn&#8217;t the best time to make those changes?</p>
<p>I guess the really important thing is spotting that something needs changing in the first place.  So my New Year tip: <em>notice what’s happening and what’s not happening in your life; be observant. </em>It’s amazing how clever we can all be at <em>not</em> noticing stuff sometimes; we settle into comfort zones so easily that we can quickly become blind to what we’re doing and what outcomes we are getting.  Comfort zones are like that – they’re strangely dis-abling because we get used to the habit and don’t notice that other things and people have evolved around us.  Do this: notice a comfort zone habit and just change it.  Just a bit.  And see what happens.  Go on – it’s the New Year after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-resolutions-bah-humbug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year&#8217;s message from out of the Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-message-from-out-of-the-blue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-message-from-out-of-the-blue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts from the Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Year, New You? Read our top 7 tips on how to get hold of your own career! <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-message-from-out-of-the-blue/">New Year&#8217;s message from out of the Blue</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Year – New You!   <em>A New Year’s Message from Blue Bamboo</em></strong></p>
<p>The coming of the New Year is a time for reflection and, often, for considering new career options.  In the current economic climate, planning for options in your career will be as valuable for your own personal development as for your business.  So why not develop your Plan A, Plan B and Plan C for the year ahead?  These days it’s up to individuals to shape their own careers by asking the right questions – so here are some questions to help you map the way ahead.</p>
<p><strong>What can I influence and control?</strong></p>
<p>If we are not enjoying work we often think we need to change everything.  However, taking small steps towards your larger goals can be empowering and can often move you to the next step of your journey.  Identify the small changes that punch bigger than their weight and make a big difference to your current situation.</p>
<p><strong>What would I like to be remembered for?</strong></p>
<p>People are motivated by many different things.  Identifying those motivational ‘hot buttons’ in yourself can release energy and provide direction.  Identify what can be put in place in your Company that will leave a legacy and really make a difference.  And  this can include your life outside of work too – helping in your local community, for charities or any environment where your skills can be shared and benefit the wider world.</p>
<p><strong>Do I want to break new ground – or replay last year?</strong></p>
<p>You may want to do something that is entirely different or simply widen your comfort zone. Consider your CV – where are the gaps that may be useful to plug?  Think about whether the implications of change are too great to you personally or whether <em>not</em> changing what you’re doing may cause people to consider you as stale and jaded, limiting your chances for further growth and progression.</p>
<p><strong>What would I like to be different or stay the same?</strong></p>
<p>What do you enjoy about your job/what would you be happy to change?  Asking some fundamental questions:  around fulfilment, how the work environment has changed, whether you want to remain in your current role/company, are you stimulated, do you like the people you work with and find them stimulating?  Tracking levels of happiness against each role you have had to date – and what it was about the jobs that brought you most fulfilment can be revealing.  Could this be replicated in any future changes?</p>
<p><strong>Do I actually want my boss’s job?</strong></p>
<p>Think broader than just climbing the tree and vertical promotion.  Lateral shifts can enable you to continue to learn and make progress over the coming years.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>How do people in your business see you?</strong></p>
<p>Recognising that your reputation influences your chances of a promotion, be aware that networking is critical to your career path.  Make sure you have some people who are willing to give you honest feedback to ‘stay on track’ and ask for advice from those you seek to emulate.  Ensure that your achievements are promulgated and your value recognised.  And do it now! Networking is time-sensitive – talk to those inside and outside your business and establish relationships before you need them.</p>
<p><strong>Research suggests that writing down your plans and options with timescales attached will ensure that you are more likely to achieve your goals</strong>.  Review your progress during the year &#8211; tracking progress can be motivating and inspirational.  As Diana Sharf Hunt is often quoted: “Goals are dreams with deadlines”.</p>
<p><strong>Happy New 2011</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2011/01/new-years-message-from-out-of-the-blue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Train them, or lose them&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/12/train-them-or-lose-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/12/train-them-or-lose-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLP & Coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What enables recruiters to hang on to their talent in a post-downturn economy?  After a few years of salary freezes and redundancies (and in some organisations, a high turnover of staff), recruitment companies are now starting to hire people again.  And current employees are sometimes feeling a little ‘weatherworn’ by the recession and tough <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/12/train-them-or-lose-them/">Train them, or lose them&#8230;.</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What enables recruiters to hang on to their talent in a post-downturn economy?  After a few years of salary freezes and redundancies (and in some organisations, a high turnover of staff), recruitment companies are now starting to hire people again.  And current employees are sometimes feeling a little ‘weatherworn’ by the recession and tough recruitment times; so some may start to look elsewhere for a fresh start or be headhunted by competitors.  So, what are the foundation stones of a successful retention strategy?</p>
<p>In my travels across the UK, meeting recruitment businesses to discuss their performance gaps, it’s interesting to note who has a robust platform in the critical area of learning &amp; development.  The people development agenda has consistently been the single most important feature of staff retention – particularly in recruitment businesses where the structure of the organisation is traditionally fairly flat.  Of course, there are loads of other tools and processes that support the super-structure that is L&amp;D: for example, how many recruitment leaders <em>really know</em> what lies behind people’s performance?  Is their training needs analysis (TNA) accurate?  And again, when an assessment of the performance gap has been carried out, what then?  What do recruiters have in place (either in-house or via external providers) to close the gap?</p>
<p>Of course, this blog is all about staff retention – and the seamless flow from defining Company aims &amp; objectives, to accurate TNA to closing the gap is an essential component of keeping your best people (and allowing those who really should be moving on to do so).  So why is L&amp;D so fundamental to your retention strategy?</p>
<p>In reports, articles, surveys and polls over the years, regardless of industry sector or type of work, putting money, time and effort into people development has consistently been acknowledged as key to motivating, retaining and driving optimal performance from teams and individuals.  We’re all familiar with what most of us say about the benefits of personal development:</p>
<p>-          Increased motivation</p>
<p>-          Increased feelings of belonging</p>
<p>-          A sense of being valued and supported; that we matter</p>
<p>-          A sense that we are more than our current behaviours</p>
<p>-          That the Company believes we are capable of better performance</p>
<p>-          That our development is not just to improve business results; it’s for us, in the round</p>
<p>So, given that L&amp;D allows for both increased motivation <em>and </em>better bottom line results, what’s curious is why the recruitment sector has not universally embraced L&amp;D (and put in place robust strategies in this space) and, furthermore, tolerated such traditionally poor quality training from external providers?</p>
<p>I think the answers are many and complex.  For the sake of this blog, let’s offer up some possible reasons for the first challenge: why haven’t recruitment businesses fully embraced the L&amp;D agenda?  Perhaps because, in a time and price-sensitive sales environment, the notion of spending time and money in training does not seem to be warranted if individuals are likely to leave for ‘better’ things within 12 to 24 months.  Indeed, the high churn in most recruitment businesses is indicative of such an accepted culture.  In fact, I would suggest that one reason why this remains a challenge for the industry is that many still regard recruitment as less of a professional career and more of a convenient ‘stop gap’ job.  Where does this come from?  My belief is that it emanates from a lack of vision from senior leadership and a legacy of when times were easier.  It didn’t matter that consultants left – there’d always be another one along the next day.</p>
<p>In the good old days when recruitment was buoyant, good consultants would stay, enjoying the personal benefits of good commission payments every month.  Now, however, with a third of recruitment companies going to the wall during the recession and clients in much more control of the market, decent, regular commission is harder to find.  The good recruiters are staying put if they feel their business is on a sound footing to get them through the current fragile climate; the poor recruiters are looking for work.  So now, more than ever, there’s a case for investing in the L&amp;D agenda – to keep the good people and get them to deliver even more results for the business.</p>
<p>So what about the quality of L&amp;D within the recruitment market today?  I have to say, the landscape of external training provision is littered with well-intentioned entrepreneurs who have made it in the heyday of boom times, wanting to roll out <em>their</em> model as a set of training modules; it’s also populated by people who perpetuate the notion that recruitment is no more than a crude sales process, where persuasion and spin are all that’s required to place a candidate (in the hope that their candidate will stay in post long enough to cross the calendar threshold of returning the client’s fee as laid down in their Terms).  And that’s about it really.  Two choices – ‘my way’ or the ‘sales’ way.  As we all know, it’s only when we get beyond three options that real choice becomes available to human beings.  And recruiters are human, aren’t they?</p>
<p>And what of the landscape on internal provision in the L&amp;D space?  A mixed bag, it would appear, ranging from no provision at all, to young, inexperienced HR grads studying CIPD, to MD’s who “train their staff” regularly – often repeating the same model, regardless of the nature of their changing and sophisticated audience.  It’s rare, from my view of the marketplace, to see a recruitment business who really knows what excellent L&amp;D looks like; furthermore, it appears that even those businesses that endorse training and personal development still believe ‘training’ to be <em>the</em> thing to plug the gap on performance – very often as a singular intervention, in groups, in isolation.  Shame really; human beings are sophisticated animals, particularly in terms of why, how and what they learn.  Thinking that sending your people on the odd training course (particularly when the content and delivery has suffered from only having its own internal referencing for feedback) is at best well-meaning and at worst naive.  And what of coaching, mentoring, blended learning, CPD, behavioural competency frameworks&#8230;&#8230;?</p>
<p>Learning is <em>systemic</em>.  Everything (and I mean <em>everything</em>) has a bearing on how effectively L&amp;D works in a business – from client relationship strategies, to sales processes, to the colour in the kitchenette or break-out areas, to how people talk to each other, to the power and congruence of the senior leadership team’s vision for the future&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So is it possible that the recruitment sector have inadvertently restricted themselves to these two options?  Can it be that they, for all their positive intentions, look to external providers for help, not knowing what ‘good’ looks like?  I believe this is the case.  The recruitment sector deserves better: from both the world of external L&amp;D provision and from their own profession who, only in certain niche areas, has fully embraced the notion of <em>being</em> a profession.  My call to action?</p>
<p>-          Get someone in who can help you <em>really </em>know where you are (in terms of recognising that performance, as is learning, a <em>systemic </em>thing)</p>
<p>-          Get to a point of real clarity about <em>what you (collectively) want</em></p>
<p>-          Only then can you <em>plan</em> how to get there</p>
<p>And for goodness sake, let’s encourage those in the industry to believe themselves as professionals, delivering a necessary, valuable and professional service to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">people</span> – and as we all know, being fulfilled, successful and happy in your job is a pretty fundamental ‘right’ for human beings.  We should strive to embrace this fact – and embrace the fact that the very best recruiters are those that are properly trained, coached, mentored, supported, challenged, encouraged to evolve etc. etc. etc&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/12/train-them-or-lose-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on the recent NLP Conference in London….</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/11/reflections-on-the-recent-nlp-conference-in-london/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/11/reflections-on-the-recent-nlp-conference-in-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLP & Coaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NLP Conferences are an interesting experience&#8230;&#8230;and the NLP Conference in London last weekend was no exception. It was certainly very different from the NLP Research Conference in Cardiff that I attended earlier in the year</p> <p>I attended the Saturday and Sunday events with colleagues from Blue Bamboo; it was also great to meet up <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/11/reflections-on-the-recent-nlp-conference-in-london/">Reflections on the recent NLP Conference in London….</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NLP Conferences are an interesting experience&#8230;&#8230;and the NLP Conference in London last weekend was no exception. It was certainly very different from the NLP Research Conference in Cardiff that I attended earlier in the year</p>
<p>I attended the Saturday and Sunday events with colleagues from Blue Bamboo; it was also great to meet up with some of the people that journeyed through the Trainers Training experience with me (that seemed a long time ago. Perhaps the bonding and sharing that we all went through that culminated in our trainer&#8217;s certificate created some sort of odd temporal distortion.  Of course, a significant amount of &#8216;real&#8217; time had actually passed since then.  Odd thing,time&#8230;..)</p>
<p>Anyway, I digress.</p>
<p>The theme for this blog is a sort of &#8216;random thoughts and opinions on the recent NLP Conference&#8217; &#8211; for those who are curious about these matters. As I write now, I get an eerie sense that I might well go off on one&#8230;.it is, after all, a fairly well-embedded habit of mine.</p>
<p>So to start, as blogs are supposed to be a personal view, I make no apologies for sharing some thoughts that hereby acknowledge my subjective map of the world.  My views arise from attending some seminars, but clearly not all (although it encourages me to push forward with the temporal distortion piece so I can attend all the sessions simultaneously next time&#8230;)  I also bring forward some thoughts formulated from break out moments and soaking up the general ambience of the weekend.</p>
<p>For me, the NLP Conference left me feeling encouraged, concerned, affirmed, delighted, curious, disappointed, inspired, determined – of course, I have all of these feelings and more while watching a single episode of Spooks.  So why, “encouraged”?  Because I sensed that the overwhelming majority of people who attended wanted to share, learn and observe.  Like every bus queue, birthday party and marching band, there were multiple perspectives and maps of reality present.  And therein lies the beauty and challenge for human beings – living with difference yet looking for connections. NLP as an organic and evolutionary thing resides in this space too; many would argue that creating some shared framework on how best to present NLP to the ‘outside world’ would be important. It’s fascinating to read all the threads and comments on line about this topic and seeing the emergence of different opinions, all vying for dominance.  For my part, I’m keen to see leaders in the NLP field give weight to those who are pressing ahead with establishing some core standards and definitions of NLP.  Sadly, there are still many ‘out there’ who practice, train and qualify others in NLP with very little credibility and, at worst, in an unhealthy or even dangerous way. Hence the continuing debates around regulation.</p>
<p>At the Conference, NLP was certainly presented in many and various ways; from my perspective, some healthier than others.  For example, it was obvious the distinctions between those hell bent on selling their business and those simply wanting to share and explore; between those who clearly embodied the pillars of NLP and those whose behaviours at least seemed to indicate to the contrary.  Rapport, for example – a fundamental of NLP – was off the radar for some.  As was sensory acuity, a responsiveness to feedback and behavioural flexibility.  I guess I came with an expectation that all NLP people exhibit these behavioural characteristics to a greater or lesser extent&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>What was great to witness was the enthusiasm to continue with the evolution and ongoing development of NLP, whether as a philosophical outlook, a trail of techniques or even as an integrated tool within coaching (to name but a few).  So with all this innovation, is there a need for a clean, congruent centre to hold it all together?  I believe so – and the tweets, threads, articles, forums and discussions across the NLP and coaching space is indicative of a growing sense of the importance of establishing some common definitions and a ‘best way’ to present NLP to the public.</p>
<p>So whilst I remain optimistic that this will emerge over time (being encouraged by the work of ANLP and others, for example) I want to offer up a piece of the jigsaw to consider as we practitioners and trainers of NLP work the issue through.  I introduce them in the form of a question:</p>
<p>What would need to be different at a personal level for each of us that would enable genuine co-operation and collaboration? The ego has a powerful way of suggesting that ‘my way is the best way’&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>So having been a little pejorative in my review of the NLP Conference, I’ll end the blog with some of the highlights for me:</p>
<p>-    Observing a couple of exquisite coaching sessions, examining the topic of getting really well-formed goals for clients, Michael Hall.  I’d recommend any of his work; in person, it was a joy to see such beautifully crafted coaching questions, gentle and compassionate rapport and responsiveness, a clear focus on getting a congruent and aligned next step for his client and deeply integrated NLP at work.  Fabulous.<br />
-    Listening to Judy Pearson speak on Intuitive Wisdom and Collective Consciousness; rigorously referenced and credible, beautifully paced and presented and a topic close to my heart – how we can find shared space beyond conscious thought when we trust<br />
-    An informal conversation with a chap looking to go on trainers training, as he was working out which one to go for; interesting how chance encounters can help to clarify, reinvigorate and affirm the choices we made (or are about to make)<br />
-    Dianne Lowther’s session on NLP in Business; great to see such congruent integration of NLP, a number of robust ways of introducing NLP to business customers and how self-belief and a passion for your subject matter can go a long, long way to win over hearts and minds about NLP<br />
-    And, back to Michael Hall: a lovely session introducing a simple tool that can measure levels of self-actualisation (how satisfied are we that our basic needs are being met as well as our high ‘meta needs’, taking Maslow into a highly accessible realm.</p>
<p>All in all, money and time well-spent.  Looking forward to the next one now&#8230;..!</p>
<p>There are some further thoughts, including a White Paper and additional resources being posted into the Blue Bamboo website in the next few days.  Sign-up for access to Blue Bamboo&#8217;s Resource Centre, a veritable knowledge base of up-to-date, downloadable information on the subjects we know best.  It’s free and registration takes seconds &#8211; all we need is your email address. The Resource Centre link can be found on our Home page. www.bluebambooconsulting.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/11/reflections-on-the-recent-nlp-conference-in-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/download/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts from the Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've just got back from spending a long weekend at the Download Festival at Donnington Park. Loud music. So why would I be writing about such an event here, on what is effectively supposed to be a business blog?  <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/download/">Download!</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I thought I&#8217;d download a few thoughts&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just got back from spending a long weekend at the Download Festival at Donnington Park.  Loud music.  And the great and the good of the rock-loving public, all 40,000 of them (although I lost count at about 136).</p>
<p>So why would I be writing about such an event here, on what is effectively supposed to be a business blog?  Because, as you all know, my colleagues and I at Blue Bamboo are fascinated by people &#8211; what they do, how they do it, what outcomes they get and why they do it.  And at Download there was plenty of opportunity to observe and reflect on a really amazing bunch of people&#8230;..</p>
<p>And there were thousands of people to observe: from the &#8216;old rockers of latter day saints&#8217; club, young pretenders from the &#8216;we can scream louder than you&#8217; gang, children showing off new wellies, babies showing off new fluffy hair and bright eyes straining in the afternoon sun, families, musicians, fans, writers, poets, priests, short people, long people, square people, trend setters, commercial directors, painters, sales people and wannabies &#8211; and ME with my 15year old and his mobile phone seemingly grafted into his hand.</p>
<p>The inspiration for this blog is my curiosity about paradox: it seems that when you put that many people in one place there&#8217;s not a lot you can do to police them, to control them or influence them to behave in any particular way.  There&#8217;s simply too many.  So a strange thing happened: with the lightest touch of an ever-present security team, people gravitated towards a common expression, a shared set of behaviours, a similar attitude.  With no real direction from the festival management or security teams, people found a consensus: to simply have a good time, be nice to each other, acknowledge and respect (though not really notice or comment on) the magical diversity of human beings.</p>
<p>I wanted to write about this gift of a metaphor: how, in certain circumstances, people can find their own way to live harmoniously, behave excellently and get what they wanted <em>even though individuals no doubt had different personal agendas.</em></p>
<p>How can this provide a parallel to the world of business and to team dynamics I wonder?  In some sense, it&#8217;s obvious: when people &#8211; <em>everybody</em> get permission to do what they want, we recognise that each person has the same right.  So it becomes a shared goal to support each other&#8217;s goals, knowing that everyone is doing the same thing for each other.  It&#8217;s a sort of mutual &#8216;get what you want&#8217; theme.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it&#8217;s even more curious to note that individual goals also share similarities.  The NLP concept of &#8216;chunks&#8217; of information and the &#8216;hierarchy of ideas&#8217; both point to an apparent truism: that there appears to be a place, at least at some point in the hierarchy, where we all share a common purpose.</p>
<p>When businesses and teams go looking for this &#8216;higher&#8217; chunk, this shared purpose, they often find it.  It seems that disagreement and conflict often arise from arguments about &#8216;how&#8217; to get to a goal.  When we focus on &#8216;what&#8217; we want &#8211; and how exiting it is to recognise how much we share in terms of common purpose and vision &#8211; the &#8216;how to get there&#8217; debate becomes more of a creative surge, rather than an opportunity to express entrenched, subjective opinions.</p>
<p>As well as returning home with ACDC, Bullet for My Valentine and Rage Against the Machine still reverberating in my head, I was left with an enduring hope for the future: that people are capable of amazing things when they give themselves, and others, permission to get what they want.  In our own way, all of us at Download were living some important principles that are found embedded in NLP: there&#8217;s always a positive intention behind every behaviour and a focus on &#8216;what&#8217; and &#8216;why&#8217; is the necessary pre-cursor to our &#8216;how&#8217; strategies.  Interesting where we find our most useful learning experiences, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coaching Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/coaching-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/coaching-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Luttrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLP & Coaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So it would appear that the debate around regulating coaching continues &#8211; reinvigorated, in part perhaps, to Government plans, recently announced, to reduce bureaucracy and red tape across the business world.</p> <p>Not only have we seen the demise of a number of quangos and executive agencies in recent months, Vince Cable, business secretary, has <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/coaching-regulation/">Coaching Regulation</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it would appear that the debate around regulating coaching continues &#8211; reinvigorated, in part perhaps, to Government plans, recently announced, to reduce bureaucracy and red tape across the business world.</p>
<p>Not only have we seen the demise of a number of quangos and executive agencies in recent months, Vince Cable, business secretary, has also announced further action to help rejuvenate businesses, hoping to stimulate growth by cutting “excessive regulation”.  His &#8220;star chamber” will proved momentum for new legislation and a “challenge group” will be tasked with generating alternatives to what is perceived as an already overly-regulated United Kingdom.<br />
In principle, both the CBI and FSB (and most unions) are in support of these initiatives and, indeed, welcome the general thrust towards more flexibility and common sense.</p>
<p>So how does the push for less bureaucracy affect the coaching profession?</p>
<p>Coaching has been around in business for many years of course. Over the last 10 years in particular there has been mounting interest and comment around the monitoring of coaching by a regulatory body. The general consensus is that Coaching professionals have a personal responsibility to ensure they are adequately trained and qualified, as well as a professional responsibility to clients and peers in the coaching space to develop and maintain levels of competence and credibility.  Like many other professions, self-governance seems to be the favoured position of this professional responsibility.</p>
<p>From a personal perspective, I have (sadly) met a few people who have been ‘qualified’ in Coaching (and the closely related discipline of NLP) and are now practising with clients in a manner that I would judge to be at best variously knowledgeable about Coaching &amp; NLP concepts and at worst unethical and dangerous. Fortunately, my trainings to date have all been with Master Trainers with an acute sensitivity to the ethical and ecological dimensions of working with people as they go through sometimes significant changes in their lives.  For me, coaching (and NLP) is all about congruency, authenticity and ecology – mine and the client’s.</p>
<p>So will regulation provide a framework whereby ‘best practice’ can be promulgated?  What are the benefits of regulation?  What exactly should or could be regulated?  Who would benefit?  Should coaches welcome external regulation or push for self-regulation?  And what, ultimately, are the aims of bringing coaching (with or without NLP) under such control?</p>
<p>I guess that there could be a number of reasons why regulation could be helpful.  It could help to:<br />
-	set benchmark standards and define competencies against which coaching professionals can be measured<br />
-	bring maverick and ‘below standard’ coaching practices into line or purge the existing supply base to only those that meet the standard<br />
-	protect this growing and increasingly competitive marketplace<br />
-	give weight and credibility to the profession by publishing standards and protected titles<br />
-<br />
However, counter-arguments abound:</p>
<p>-	self-regulation (SR) inevitably will generate more paperwork<br />
-	given the current trends in this burgeoning career, with many setting up as multiple types of coaching titles (Portfolio Coaching??), surely people will simply deselect themselves from protected titles and do their own thing<br />
-	the appetite for regulation from with the profession itself is low; is coaching doing any harm out there? Probably not, so why would we need to be regulated at all?<br />
-	would regulation stifle the evolution of the profession or somehow put unhelpful barriers in front of clients?<br />
-	are we in danger of heralding in the over-engineering of “professionalising” coaching?</p>
<p>It seems generally acknowledged that the likely external regulator will be the HPC (Health Professionals Council).  Within the coaching community, there is certainly more enthusiasm for SR. Professor David Lane, Research Director of the International Centre for the Study of Coaching at Middlesex University, spoke last November at AC UK’s debate on the subject.  He seemed to lean towards SR within a model whereby professional coaches and researchers work collaboratively to initiate and manage the emergent knowledge and practice base.  Coaching is, after all, multidisciplinary and covers an extremely wide range of applications and techniques.  The AC UK itself takes a position supporting SR, ensuring ongoing and open dialogue with relevant government bodies.</p>
<p>So where does all this leave coaches in terms of their emerging art?  As far as the protection of clients is concerned, there seems little evidence that a lack of regulation is harming them.  Most select on the basis of their level of confidence that their coach will actually help them get the results they want. It’s a grown-up process without the need, it seems, to have government legislate for an individual’s or Company’s choice.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, there is still a push from various influential parties to keep the regulation debate alive.  Coaches need to engage with the debate, recognising that ground-swells happen (Malcolm Gladwell, we thank you!) Otherwise, coaches might find themselves on the receiving end of unwelcome news.</p>
<p>While BPS, HPC and others remain enthusiastic for regulation, coaches who take their careers seriously (engaged with their own ongoing learning, being supervised by mentors and getting qualified by reputable training federations and alliances) continue to build credibility and expertise.  Clients are the ones who let us know if it’s working for them.  Perhaps they are the ones we should all be listening to a bit more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluebambooconsulting.com/blog/2010/06/coaching-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

